Talk:Giberbyte7/@comment-32845126-20171229125258/@comment-26318250-20180128114153

In that case, the treason rules should be more well-defined. I have seen an admin block someone for "treason" when the user just said that the admin's pasta was bad. I do not think there should be rules for "offending an admin", that is retarded and allows possibly corrupt admins to exploit it.

Obviously, a treason rule should be in place, but it should be for personal attacks on admins, and that should be clearly stated so that it can't be exploited.