Board Thread:Special Admin Messages/@comment-25793989-20180602214408/@comment-32774689-20180606224139

Popstar792 wrote: WhoWatchesTheToasters wrote: No community is perfect. You propose removing the public enemies, a list of people who have attacked this wiki. I like Hood and Cutter because they are strict people who stand up to others.

You threw 3 months of hard negotiations, which I was involved heavily in, out the window when you unbanned Tangy, Rogue, and Carrot, then told us afterwards.

I do not like your platform. That is my position, your's may be different, and I respect that. But I have mine as well. Well, quite true. I'll stay neutral on this, but I'll only say that since I've been here Ittyy has been suggesting we unban many public enemies. I personally think that Ittyy wants peace, but not all enemies deserve to be unbanned. They sometimes need to learn their lesson. Unbanning them will give them the mindset that they can do things that are against the rules in the future and eventually be unbanned. We need a bureaucrat that keeps a hard stance on the rules no matter what and won't just unban people to create peace. It doesn't always make peace and the way for an enemy to realize their wrong-doings is that they be punished and they eventually will make their own peace. No offense to Ittyyy, but this is what I don’t like about his campaign.