Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-33594813-20180206171132

Well, I thought up a new way to resolve conflicts between two or more users on this wiki. Because the fact we are arguing frequently is really upsetting me and other users of this wiki. I thought of a better way to resolve conflicts. This involves:

An admin (or bureaucrat if one of the users involved is an admin) to listen to all sides of the story and take this into consideration.

Decide the punishment for one or more users if necessary, but definitely do not make the punishment too harsh.

Ensure the users involved apologise to each other, make up, and become friends again.

Note the argument (what happened, who was involved, etc) to keep it in mind if these users argue again.

So anyways, what do you think about this? It could be easier than putting up polls to ban people, or randomly taking one user's side, when the other user(s) might have a side of the story to tell. I believe we shouldn't take sides in conflicts, rather we should listen to all sides of the story. What do you think?

I am EnderChas. United we fly, divided we fall. (talk) 17:11, February 6, 2018 (UTC) 