Thread:MasterFrown0704/@comment-33719196-20180819230626/@comment-35072152-20180820163210

PurpleTheUnicorn wrote: Popstar792 wrote: In all honestly, I still look at many of the users on this wiki as cowards, although I do agree that this is the best way to make peace for the war. Its like, everybody is just trying to act like everything is okay, and it just seems as though they're trying to reassure themselves that they should cope with being forced into the demands of a terrorist. Even my friend from another wiki has said this. They're being manipulated into thinking them taking action or banning someone of their wrongdoings is considered causing drama because the person will cause a war about it. And its honestly fucked up. Everybody complains, but they're too scared to do anything about it. But hey, whatever this wiki's choice is, we'll just have to deal with it, and just try not to cause drama about anything. I think I should just start staying neutral on this whole thing from now on. I don't have much against Chas, despite his actions, he has been polite to me, and I haven't seen the full war, so I shall not judge anyone. I just cannot understand how a wiki operates like this. I've been in plenty of cold wars and I can assure you that Chas war would have ended even if he was still banned. Its just that this wiki's actions made it worse. These people have nobody to blame but themselves, and sadly, Icy was right. You guys are now in a situation were you all are dogs and must obey the commands of two users who were public enemies, or else you guys will have to face being tormented by a whole group of people. Eventually, anybody will be able to get whatever they want by simply starting a war. Who else is going to start punking this wiki around?

I'm not one to start drama, so I won't make any confusion about this. I'm only voicing an opinion.

I am a coward or someone else? The other users, (not all of them), Purple.