Board Thread:Special Admin Messages/@comment-35223544-20180927172028/@comment-35072152-20180927233516

1. for the 50 lines in pastas. 5 sentences is a paragraph, so basically, you're saying that users would have to write 10 whole paragraphs of a pasta? First, pastas can be long or short, stating in the rules (I'm the one who added it and replaced the old rule). That's like the old rule where pastas had to be long or else they could be marked for deletion. Nah. As long as the pasta isn't one sentence long, it's alright. Other than that, the length of the pasta doesn't matter, and it doesn't mean it's going to be a great pasta if it's long either. There are many great pastas out there that are less than 50 lines.

2. The only "approval" that staff should be doing is making sure the pasta isn't filled with gibberish and isn't just a sentence long. Because many staff will have differing opinions on a pasta, and if many of them are having different opinions on whether the pasta should be removed, the author will get upset, and this could cause unnecessary drama.

3. All pastas should have decent grammar. If a user is misspelling in a pasta, it can be fixed instead of being deleted.

4. As I've said, the only deletion that should be happening is if a pasta was full of spam, promoted hate, illegal activity, or is one sentence long. A user can receive a warning, and if they don't listen, they can be banned. However, don't delete pastas that seem bad in your opinion and ban the user for it. That's unfair.

Also, I've already changed the rules for pastas. It should do the trick.