Thread:JustJuuno/@comment-27021824-20170901114527/@comment-28272355-20170910124418

Apologies if I hadn't responded to this message for a long time. I never recieved a notification from this message for some reason.

Anyway, it's because I have perspectives and opinions from one thing to another. I talk to myself whether one thing is good or not by judging its activities, interactivities, and its consequences. What I first think of for the subject is how and what it does. If I managed to get correct info, I start researching its outcomes. If the outcome is good, I'll leave it be or improve it. If the outcome is bad, I'll take necessary action if I must.

For example, a user in the wiki is very helpful and dedicated in helping the wiki. However, this user is very defensive and very judge-mental whenever someone feels that the idea of this user is wrong. Then the user will lead in necessary measures to make that person agree with him/her, which is some kind of a communist act. I'd take light actions I could do to prevent or slow this, by interrogating the user that being very defensive to one's own ideas can be good, but particularly bad if it leads to forceful agreement from one person to another.

So, mostly, it'll be about your skill of resourcefulness. It all depends on morale, outcome, and interactivity with its surroundings. Try to take on something with your intel, but keep in mind to always research first so you can prove what's right and what's not.