Thread:EnderChas/@comment-26318250-20180130110448/@comment-26318250-20180130134746

EnderChas wrote: Yes, Prism was right, I should of read it through fully first. I deleted In the trees as it had a ton of binary in it, which I misunderstood as spam. The page has been restored and this matter shouldn't be obsessed over as I didn't EVEN KNOW the page belonged to Prism. If I had known, I wouldn't of deleted it. I didn't want any punishment for you. You deleted several pages worthy of deletion (in fact, most of them were). Just saying that you should read the articles you are deleting. Just because they are short, does not mean they are bad. Not everything short needs to be deleted.