Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-36816124-20180904040620/@comment-30238789-20180904231957

Haikusfortodd wrote: Bella1963 wrote: Haikusfortodd wrote:

Bella1963 wrote: Hello.

I am Haikusfortodd, although that isn’t who I really am. I am a loyal member of this wiki’s staff team. I am one of your admins/content mods. I am one of them. However, I refuse to reveal my identity. This wiki is so toxic and full of drama that the thought of revealing my name is terrifying. ''You do realize that a lot of people knows my name, yet I've never really participated in the war? Don't be afraid.''

This place is horrible. There is so much corruptness in the air that I want to puke. The hypocrisy, immaturity, arrogance and the blind praising that occurs on this wiki is amazing. I am not trying to spread hate to anyone in particular but there are definitely a few stand-outs.

''This used to be a small community of writers who are friends with each other. It's reasonable that some people still aren't used to it yet.''

Now let’s get to the point.

Let’s start with Chas. Chas is crazy, no doubt about that. But have you ever thought that there might be a logical reason to his spree of hatred? I have investigated and come up with a result: Yes. Believe it or not, there is. The Chas/Green conflict started with the plagiarism drama involving a youtube video created by Chas. This drama was quickly resolved and forgotten about.

Then, one of his friends by the name of Stacy was banned for being ‘underage’. She attempted to make sockpuppets, however she was harassed to the point that Chas decided to ban the people who were targeting her. Despite being in right of doing so it caused an outrage and he was promptly banned. This was when he decided to do the revolution and all that crap that he stupidly did afterwards. Maybe Chas should have asked other bureaucrats about this before doing this?

After he got unbanned he got banned again. And as far as I can tell it was for reporting harassment put onto him by Hood, Pop and a few others. ''You know, Chas banned me once because I liked Doki Doki Literature Club? And I still forgave him?''

This. Is. Disgusting.

Apparently, we are so blind that we can’t even consider the emotions of a ‘victim’ because oh no, this is horrible, he accused a bcrat of something he obviously didn’t do, lets just ban him with no real insight or emotional breakdown of what happened. Unless I am mistaken, that is what happened. This is no excuse for Deku’s ban, no, but still.

Speaking of Deku, lets move on to the second point – hypocrisy and immaturity. If you search up Mike Zilo in users you will find a user page of a banned user which has been heavily vandalised. Further investigation shows that Deku was behind this – a bcrat. A bcrat who disobeyed many of our wiki rules in the process. Vandalising and harassing peeps ain’t cool, and the fact that he did this and got away with it is unacceptable. Deku was recently elected and the rule was also recently established.

You can also view the comments of the popular creepypastas – Herobrine, Entity 303 etc. Here you will find a lovely place full of staff members bashing and mocking creepypasta believers, which once again is against the rules, and other unranked users trying to praise and follow these believer bashers out of fear. I personally think it's kind of silly when there is also obvious evidence that most CreepyPastas are fake.

There are also staff members who attack others and swear a crap ton for no reason – take Toasters for example. He swears way too much and yet nobody cares, despite it CLEARLY being against the rules. Oh, and there is more. Y’know how we are banning sockpuppets for trolling etc.? Well, why doesn’t anyone pay attention to CZHouzit’s alts? Ugh. But there’s more! Y’know, if a content mod or lower used sockpuppets to rig an election, they would get banned, right? Well Chicken only got temp demoted, because he is considered a ‘war hero’ despite the fact that he has caused wars and ‘false’ banned people for ‘treason’. Hm, remind you of anyone? Toaster censors most of his swearing and Houzit's alts are for roleplay and/or giving hints and leaking plots of their story to users.

We also have people who take this whole war thing way to seriously. Pop, Toasters – just to name a few. But most importantly we have everyone’s favourite Gen V war hero, Blueheart. Oh boy. A lot of these people tend to over-exaggerate crap and make it all seem like a disaster is imminent any second. These people need to calm the hell down. This wiki was not made for war. This wiki was not built around drama. Years ago, when LifeUpStudios reigned – well, that’s the point. He didn’t reign. He didn’t treat the wiki like his castle, one that he needs to protect the moment something bad happens, one that would constantly do literal public executions (ban petitions), one that fed off negativity. Of course, a lot of people opposed it, saying he needed to be harsher, thus starting the First Trollpasta War with Themaster and Itty. But our wiki hasn’t gotten stricter – just greedier. ''Is it wrong for us to want to defend our wiki? To defend users from being banned? Ban petitions are not public executions. They're more like a court where people establish whether if someone did a crime or not, and what kind of punishment they should get.''

These people treat these wars like a fun little game, one that Itty has referred to as the ‘faker’s game’ in the past. They make it seem like it’s the universe, which they are of the centre of. They want the war to be about them, they want to be seen as heroes by the bcrats and they will constantly push for more conflicts for them to be the hero of. ''Users are being banned. How is this a game?''

I quote ’This brings us to the biggest and bloodiest war of the wiki, however as a whole, it's sort of like 4 wars as a whole. The war In taking about scarred many users for life, and I'm actually not making it up, proned some users to nearly take their own lives, only being convinced otherwise by their allies. I'm talking about the EnderChas War. ‘

‘Scarred many users for life’ & ‘proned some users to nearly take their own lives’. That’s just wrong, wrong, wrong. ''Yosh and Green almost retired forever, there was a point where the wiki almost died, and the wiki is never the same. How did not scar many users for life?''

And finally, one last thing before I move to the solutions – notice how a lot of the past wars involve RCCW? RCCW seems to be the root of most evil, and members from that wiki want to spread their wars to our wiki for bonus attention points. Uncool. ''So, are you suggesting friends should be separated just because of the confilicts between two wikis? That's just cruel.''

Solutions!

Yay, the good part.

First off, sever all ties with RCCW. Just do it. Please. So I should ignore my friends on the RCCW because of this conflict?

Then remake the rules again. I know this has been brought up before but we should also edit the punishments to make them more directed towards stopping flamers.

Make sure the bcrats actually govern the goddamn wiki instead of pretending to be part of wars. Please. Deal with the actual problems inside our wiki rather than crying over Chas. ''They do. Also, what would you expect from a group of underage teenagers? Cut the b-crats some slack.''

Speaking of Chas – we don’t care about what he is doing unless it directly affects the wiki. That goes to all other rulebreakers as well. ''Are you suggesting that we should just wait for our users to be banned? Wow. Good advice.''

Also – we need to make people in our wiki feel safe. If they have a problem, don’t just ban them for speaking up. This is why half our wiki lives in fear. Also make our wiki more welcoming and happy, rather than full of petty drama. ''This wiki is fairly welcoming in my opinion. I felt very welcome on my first few days on the wiki.''

And one last thing;

The way to peace isn’t by ending the war,

The way to peace is by starting the peace. How will we start peace without ending the war?

~ haikusfortodd

- Bella1963 —  (talk)' 09:08, September 4, 2018 (UTC)  I will respond to this soon. Very well then After reading this through it felt a bit agressive. Because of this I am going to limit my responses.

No. i am not telling you to stop talking to RCW altogether.

Yes. We should just ban them and get over with it. Sockpuppets come? Ask FANDOM to ip ban them. They do? Great. Problem solved. The end.

No, Toaster never censors his swearing and CZHouzit has harrassed Pop and Styrofoamheart at least once in live chat.

No, the vandalising rule was not 'recently established'.

That is it. Was I a bit too aggressive? Sorry 'bout that.