Board Thread:Special Admin Messages/@comment-25793989-20190311062503/@comment-35072152-20190315094331

Ittyyy wrote: An Enderman wrote: Popstar792 wrote: Shrautsticks wrote: Now lets go back on topic. Anyways, despite the votes, I guess are for pro anon, but at the same time, many people feel that it could come with some difficulties. Have anons ever really been such a big issue to this wiki? Pasta believing. A big chunk of the pasta believers were anons I don't mean to be rude but for real - boohoo, some people believe a story. It honestly isn't a community-destroying problem, and personally not enough to warrant not letting them back. But of course, since many people here overreacted, and they just had to get rid of anybody who believed in one story, they banned them and eventually decided they didn't want anons for the simple fact that they didn't want any pasta believers. That's why a rule had to come out that states that pastas can be believed if the reader wanted to believe it.