Board Thread:Ban Petitions/@comment-35439862-20180819152158

Hello.

You may be surprised about this note appearing in your notification tab, but recently, the user EnderChas has been involved a bit of a debate/argument about repent trials, which will be ending September 20th. During that argument, I found out he created A sockpuppet account, Breaking rule 13 of this wiki, as well as rule 6 of repenting users.

''6. The user is to use their original account. Sockpuppeting will result in a permaban and will make you ineligible for another trial.''

''13. A punishment is a punishment, no exceptions. If a staff member chooses to punish you for a rule break, you must accept it. You can discuss a ban with an admin, but when a punishment if finalized, it's finalized.''

In case you don't know or remember, Chas is arguably the most controversial user in this wiki's history. His offences include, but are not limited to:


 * Got two administrators of this wiki permanently FANDOM banned (Yoshfico123, BlitzFire34)
 * Dragged the war forwards for two months, possibly longer.
 * Got three wikis involved, making the war's DEFCON rating a DEFCON 1 (The DEFCON rating is also dead; the smaller, the more intense the war is).
 * Caused massive panic and outrage in the wikis, like all wars do.
 * Caused lots of retirements due to his extreme negative reputation and the war itself.
 * Commited multiple offences and got away with them prior to the actual war.
 * In eccense; Pretty much forced us to give him an unban.

Yeah.

This is why I am asking for opinions. I am debating in my mind if wether or not I should ban him, so I'm asking for community advice. Do you think one of, if not, the most controversial user in this wiki's history really deserved an unban? Do you want to punish him for his offences, or let them slide?

Another benefit of banning him would be that repent trials can end early. Removing repent trials is a choice I confirmed, although I needed to fully discipline Chas before I did.

Note that the user is retiring, so this poll will only last 3 days. Until then, please let me know what you think. This is how you should respond:

 Permaban.



So use the, or  templates to once again decide Chas' fate.

If there is enough support, then I will ban him.

If there is enough opposition, then he will stay unbanned until he retires.

Voting begins now, and ends August 22, 11:30 UTC-4. Vote wisely and do note use sockpuppetry.  