Board Thread:Wiki Changelog/@comment-32774689-20180501083046/@comment-25793989-20180505074930

15. If any community/wiki declares war on us, simply ignore the community and go about your routine. It doesn't matter if they send vandals or anything else towards us, just ignore the community and act as if it didn't declare war. This also applies to radical users, as well.

If he wants to talk to Chas (I said his nameee) then why can't he? If he wants to 'side with Chas' why do we have to ban him for that?

Calling this situation a 'war' also is contradictory to rule 15. Calling him a traitor, changing our 'friendship levels' towards him, mocking his name and then regretting it due to the fact that this a 'serious situation' - if you ask me, it all seems a little over-the-top. As a matter of fact, all of the above seems to be harrassment in my eyes.

If Chas wants to make a new wiki, why the hell do we care? It ain't ever going to be as big as ours, and it doesn't need to cause us any problems at all. I barely knew this guy, but I seriously believe that banning him for joining another wiki in an non-existant war is crazy.

Crazy.

Also, the 'No Talking to Chas' rule seems to be gone from the front page. Just letting ya know.

~ Itty