Board Thread:Special Admin Messages/@comment-25793989-20180422222347/@comment-30319843-20180423143809

TheMysteriousHood wrote: In my opinion, I believe we should remove public enemy tags because it gives the public enemy what they desire: Attention.

Then again, most public enemies would probably rage for being considered as one.

The DEFCON table is a fair idea, as it gives the users a knowledge of how likely will a wiki conflict happen, but putting it on the home page is not alright in my opinion, as some ratings can cause fear and/or panic.

Whiles rules have changed, they still have some problems. Instead of instantly banning users after they break a rule, we should give them up to three warning. After the third warning, a block shall be adminstered. Three warnings would do, but for rules that highlight facts that even a common man can know about, we should give them a single final warning.

However the warning shouldn't be presented in a harsh way. The staff member who is warning a user must be compassionate and kind to him/her. This can leave a lasting impression on the person, and furthermore instantly pursuading him/her to commit such an offence again. As Itty rightly said, we should make the wiki a happy place for everybody.

Regarding the DEFCON table, I think it should be presented only to the staff members somehow. That way, we won't unknowingly disturb passerbys or so.