Board Thread:Special Admin Messages/@comment-25997078-20180128144429/@comment-26318250-20180130130629

Yoshfico123 wrote: Prism55Writes wrote:

Yoshfico123 wrote:

Prism55Writes wrote: I do not want to leave this wiki at all, no no.

But I see why people like Green/Frown want to leave.

The rules of this wiki are honestly not good. For example, the treason rules. They are not well defined, and allow admins to just do whatever they want with them. It is up to the person getting "offended" to decide what the offense is. In some cases, it is as simple as someone not liking an admin's pasta (it is mostly admins who use them to their advantage). Several admins overlook the Criticism rule, which is shit in its own way, and just straight out ban people for "treason" after they criticize their stories (there is one admin who does/used to do this this often).

Also, the rule that allows certain rules to be broken by admins. That is retarded. It is basically a setup for a corrupt admin to do whatever he/she wants on the wiki, under the guise of being an admin and thus being allowed to break rules.

The criticism rule needs to be removed. Criticism helps writers improve their works, and banning it (or thinking it is "treasonous") is a retarded mindset that help no one.

People often forget about the "Primary treason" rule, which is to not offend normal users. Of course, admins can just use the "we are allowed to break SOME rules" excuse, which basically makes the rule pointless.

EVERY admin and bureaucrat of this wiki needs to reconsider their actions. The wiki's rules need a serious overhaul to make sure they are fair and square and do not give admins too much power. Admins banning people for story criticism should face punishment.

Overall, the rules need reworking. The "Admins are allowed to break rules" rule has been abolished.

I'll rework the rules and see what i can come up with. Great news. I can't tell if that's sarcasm or an actual response.

Not sarcasm, I am actually happy that the rules are being reworked.