Board Thread:Special Admin Messages/@comment-26318250-20180913190714

TheMysteriousHood wrote: It's clear to some people now. Some staff are either too inactive or too childish to be in their position.

In order to ensure the smooth flow of everything that happens here, every month or two, we should decide who gets promoted and demoted from certain rank. We should also make a set number of allowed staff here, and random promotions and demotions will ensure the top people are among staff. Also, we should make warnings first instead of instantly banning people. Afterall, we are not like North Korea/Eritrea/USSR/Equatorial Guinea.

In order to ensure we have a good supply of staff, veterans and those with experience somewhere else should educate newcomers in how to properly do their job.

When it's the time to bring new decisions, staff should first express their opinions and see what others think instead of bickering over whose idea or plan was better.

Closing threads without very good reasons should be PUNISHABLE. The only ones worthy of such deletions are spam and very bad threads.

Well, some rules are less harsh now such as belief in pastas, but what I think we should do is to make some rules less long and more simple for understanding.

Taken from:

So, what are your thought on Hood's ideas on improving this wiki? Leave your ideas, praises and criticisms down below. 